Archive for Indonesia

Uncompromising visions of modern nightmare

Posted in Overseas, Review with tags , , , on 25 October 2009 by bhijjas

VOID — Jendela Peradaban (Window of Civilisation)
24 Oct 2009
da:ns Festival 2009
Theatre Studio, the Esplanade, Singapore.

Boi Sakti’s new work in collaboration with Singapore’s T.H.E. Dance Company gives us a sequence of powerful vignettes condemning our modern lives under capitalism and globalism as slavery without self-awareness, primitivism without sensitivity, a dehumanised world in which lives are once again nasty, brutish and short. In its best scenes, VOID has the feeling of good science fiction, akin to the written works of the recently deceased J.G. Ballard, whose horror derives from our recognition of their familiarity, the knowledge that the author or choreographer has merely observed existing themes and followed them to their logical and appalling conclusions.*

Coming from Indonesia, and giving, as the Singaporean dancers mention in the program notes, “a Southeast Asian angle”, Boi’s work is also infused with the preoccupations of our collective recent independence – ideas of neo-imperialism and exploitation. These he weaves into strong visual effects that lodge in the memory and return with nightmarish flashes of clarity. As the lights rose, some of the audience gasped involuntarily and a group of schoolchildren rose into hubbub and had to be shushed. Where before there had been darkness, suddenly the dancers stood crowded in a lit window on a little raised stage, higher than we expected and far, far too close, looking at us and past us with sightless eyes.

After this jolting opening, the visual metaphors raced by thick and fast in scenes roughly corresponding to a sequence given in the program notes: a man wrapped in chains galloping around the circle on all fours with an impossibly animal gait (’sick civilisations’); dancers in muzzles with megaphones attached to their backs being walked by other dancers holding the microphones like leads and going into frenzy at the sound of their own feedback (‘democratisation’); dancers gradually donning individual costume decorations from traditional Indonesian dance – mirrored collars, bobbing tiaras, clinking arm bands – but with no recognition of their purpose or beauty (‘new internationalism’); a man hanging upside down behind steel bars having bar-coded tags attached to him haphazardly by a blindfolded woman, next to a hinged mirror daubed with graffiti (‘capitalism’).

The most disturbing theatrical motif illustrated urbanisation, and brought to mind ‘Billennium’, Ballard’s heart-squeezing story of systematic overcrowding. One by one the dancers laid their sweating exhausted bodies in a clear perspex box, piling onto one another like genocide murders tumbling into a mass grave. One dancer gently but irresistibly helped another onto the pile, but when she herself baulked she had to force her own body, her own hand pushing herself on her lower back, to complete the freezer full of bodies. As the perspex box was wheeled across the stage by stocking-masked undertakers, I heard the woman sitting next to me whisper, “That’s horrible.” The box circled. Suddenly the accumulated heat and sweat of the dancers fogged the plastic surface, and their little remaining movements made small clear patches through which we watched them, like the dying twitches of Auschwitz victims scratching on the ceiling of their gas chamber with their fingernails.

Sandwiched in between such powerful visual elements, I sometimes felt that the sections of ‘pure’ dance lost their impact. The movement itself was strong and well-directed – featuring recurring frustrated rocking movements on the hands and knees like an insect about to attack, an impossibly fast spin on the ground, and fast-twitch convulsive scratching of their bodies – but it was frequently performed by the whole group in synchrony, which gave it a repetitiveness that may have been robotic and symbolic of lack of individual agency, but was less compelling as a result. The dancers, however, were completely physically committed to the work, audibly breathing together in their group sections. Yarra Ileto’s muscular build was particularly well-suited to the power of the movement, where some of the smaller women seemed occasionally too delicate.

I was also a little put off when the dancers being walked like dogs began to bark – it seemed too predictable, too pat. Those who have dogs know that a bark is a very expressive sound, and when a person does it, unless they have voice coaching or lots of practice, it sounds childish and flat. The point may have been that humans have lost the ability to make sense with speech, that we make noise for the very sake of it, but I felt that the combination of croaks, gasps and gulps that the dancers used elsewhere were more effective.

There was also something about beating a dead horse in all this Luddite horror. Modernity is not without its detractors. Humanity is not unaware of its problems. But, like Ballard’s, this work of Boi’s came across as blindly accusative in its lack of compromise. At its base, it is negative and unredemptive. So at the end of the work we are left with nothing to say, when the hinged mirror swings (as we knew it would) towards the audience to reveal us to ourselves.

*This observation is by Anthony Burgess, in his 1978 introduction to The Best Short Stories of J.G. Ballard, Picador New York, 1995.

When West meets East, and problems arise

Posted in Review with tags , , on 26 July 2008 by bhijjas

Dutch choreographer Gerard Mosterd is in town, en route to a new project in Jakarta. Last year he brought a collaborative work with Sumatran choreographer Boi Sakti to perform in Pentas 2 at KLPac. This time, during his brief stay, he gave a repertoire workshop at Sutra Dance Theatre, for the benefit of Sutra’s Friday evening contemporary dance class.

Sutra dancers in Gerard Mosterd's workshop.

Sutra dancers in Gerard Mosterd's workshop.

During the class he taught a phrase from a solo work he created in 2002, in which he contrasted the ambitious self-seeking world of his Dutch father with the darker, more retiring world view of his Indonesian mother. Mosterd had designed the work to highlight the differences between the European ballet tradition and Asian dance traditions; the phrase he taught in the workshop came from the latter. As he taught it, he recalled the images that had inspired the movement, from paddling wooden canoes, to stalking prey, Arjuna firing arrows, and tsunamis crashing into shore.

The phrase had a beautiful sense of breathe, rhythm, and a satisfying circularity of momentum accompanied by arms slicing and carving into the space. Any potential essentialising of East and West in its concept in no way undermined the pleasure of dancing it. At dinner afterwards, Mosterd noted that the work explored a notion of himself at in 2002, when he was struggling with the burdens of both cultures, and that his current work goes in a completely different direction. However, Mosterd continues to be interested in building links between Asia and Europe, and is embarking on a second major collaboration with a Minang choreographer in Sumatra at the end of the year, which go on tour in the Netherlands.

The previous collaboration with Boi Sakti, although it produced a very watchable show, was also apparently disastrous: it collapsed under the weight of two opinionated choreographers who were unable to reach a compromise. For his next project, Mosterd says, he has learned his lesson: this time, he will be the indisbutable boss, possibly employing a dramaturg to help mediate between the choreographers. It is a practical solution for a perennially difficult problem. When I asked, jokingly, if Mosterd felt like the returning Dutch imperialist, telling the little brown man what to do, he was not amused. I am sure Mosterd has considered this issue, and, under the circumstances, I think the issue can hardly be ignored — certainly the Indonesian choreographer, no matter how he relishes the opportunity that Mosterd is providing, will be unlikely to miss the suggestion of historical precedent.

During dinner, Mosterd expanded upon his desire to provide opportunities for Malaysian dance scholars to study in the Netherlands, especially in dramaturgy, for which the Netherlands is famous. In Europe, as he says, the state of general education is so high and the audiences so critical and demanding, that without a dramaturg to provide historical context and a dramatic structure a dance work is lost. Dramaturgy is the newest thing overseas, but has its time come in Malaysia? As I pointed out, the financial situation is so precarious here that we can hardly afford to pay our dancers, let alone hire a dramaturg! But I agree that there is certainly a need for people thinking, writing and researching about dance, as well as practising it.

It’s difficult for Malaysians to be constantly reminded of the undeveloped nature of our artistic community; it reminds us of our colonised past. While we progress in great leaps and bounds, we still feel very far behind. Mosterd was not so impolitic as to suggest that the West is teaching the East how to do it better, but this is the understanding that we share. Nevertheless, it is still a point of sensitivity for us, and future collaborations might go better by bearing it in mind.

See http://gerardmosterd.com/